Are you ready to submit your Outsourcing Register?
Some firms may get ‘an unwelcome surprise’ due to the scope and breadth of the information required to comply with the Outsourcing Register writes Dillon Eustace’s Karen Jennings. She said for firms with complex outsourcing profiles the task is likely to prove laborious and adds that, as a prerequisite, firms need to establish a methodology for determining whether outsourced activities or services are “critical” or “important”. |
Regulation to extend to the ‘Buy Now, Pay Later’ sector
Keith Waine, partner in Dillon Eustace’s Financial Regulation Unit, reviews the draft legislation that looks set to bring the fast-growing, and largely unregulated, ‘buy now, pay later’ services segment under Irish financial regulation. Currently many of the services provided by BNPL players such as Sweden’s Klarna, Italy’s Scalapay, and US’ Affirm, (primarily interest-free deferred payments) fall outside the definition of ‘credit’ set out in the Central Bank Act 1997 but new legislation is set to change this and make such services providers subject to a range of new business requirements, he says. |
Focus on the new IFR/IFD variable remuneration requirements in force from 26 June 2021
Karen Jennings reviews the new ‘variable remuneration’ regulation regime for investment firms in Ireland, under the Investment Firms Directive, which came into effect in June, identifying the Irish features that will govern pay and bonuses in the sector. |
The new Guidance on Outsourcing published by the Central Bank
Keith Waine, a partner in Dillon Eustace’s Financial Regulation Unit provides an overalll assessment of the provisional Guidance on Outsourcing that has been set out by the Central Bank of Ireland, and which is now in the process of being finalised, with a view to final publication later this year. |
Cyber Supervision – where is IT at?
The Central Bank said last year that it considered cybersecurity to be one of its key supervisory risks. That was before the COVID-19 pandemic arrived testing firms’ IT systems with large numbers of staff working remotely and which has seen an increase in phishing and malware campaigns. Muireann Reedy looks at the Central Bank’s expectations in the area. |
The Drive For Diversity
Diversity within an organisation can no longer be seen as a “nice to have” selling point. It is now an issue of regulatory concern as the Central Bank of Ireland (“CBI”) considers a lack of diversity to be a leading indicator of cultural issues within a firm. Muireann Reedy looks at some recent diversity and inclusion assessments which the CBI has carried out and recommends that diversity should be high on board agendas. |
Blowing the whistle in a European context
Last November the EU published the Whistleblower Protection Directive (Directive (EU) 2019/1937). Muireann Reedy looks at the differences between the Directive and the Protected Disclosures Act 2014, and asks what changes will it bring about for businesses?. |
Conducting your business well – regulatory scrutiny on conduct risk
The Central Bank has sharpened its focus on conduct risk since its financial conduct pillar was established in 2017. While initially the focus was on conduct risk in the retail sector, the Central Bank is now also looking at how firms which engage in wholesale market activity manage this risk. Muireann Reedy looks at developments in the area and says firms should be ready to demonstrate to the regulator how this risk is being managed. |
AML remains strategic priority for CBI
Supporting the fight against money laundering is one of the Central Bank’s strategic priorities for 2019-2021. MUIREANN REEDY looks at the increase in the number of AML inspections, the Central Bank’s AML supervisory priorities and the types of cases which have ended up in enforcement. |
Fit for purpose? The importance of meeting the Central Bank’s fitness and probity requirements
The Central Bank has sharpened its focus on fitness and probity in the last year, with a notable increase in the number of fitness and probity interviews being conducted, the issue of a “Dear CEO” letter on the topic and, for the first time, it has exercised its discretion to publish in full the reasons for a prohibition. Muireann Reedy looks at some of these developments. |
An Irish version of the FBI? The Corporate Enforcement Authority under the spotlight Taoiseach Leo Varadkar intends for the new Corporate Enforcement Authority to be “an Irish version of the FBI” when it comes to white-collar crime. Muireann Reedy looks at how the new Authority will differ from the ODCE and examines its proposed new powers. |
Guilty As Charged? The Proposals for Deferred Prosecution Agreements in Ireland The Law Reform Commission’s Report on “Regulatory Powers and Corporate Offences” recommends the introduction of Deferred Prosecution Agreements in Ireland. Muireann Reedy looks at the Law Reform Commission’s proposals and concludes that the introduction of a Deferred Prosecution Agreements could be beneficial for all parties involved. |
Risky Business: How companies can minimise the
corruption conundrum The Irish government has recently overhauled its anti-corruption laws with the enactment of the Criminal Justice (Corruption Offences) Act 2018. For the first time, corporates can be prosecuted if someone acting on their behalf commits an offence under the Act. Muireann Reedy looks at some of the Act’s key provisions and what companies can do to try to mitigate that risk. |
Financial Sanctions: the enforcement regimes which may apply to your company Following President Trump’s recent confirmation that U.S economic sanctions on Iran will be reinstated, Muireann Reedy looks at the penalties which can be imposed in various jurisdictions for non-compliance with financial sanctions regimes and notes that they can have extra-territorial reach. |
A whistle-stop tour of Irish whistleblowing legislation The Disclosures Tribunal has brought whistleblowing into sharp focus. Muireann Reedy looks at some key whistleblowing legislation, the difference between voluntary and mandatory reporting and why it is advisable for all employers to have whistleblowing policies in place. |
Fitness and Probity - Investigations and Prohibition Notices There has been much discussion of the fitness and probity regime in the context of the Tracker Mortgage Examination. Muireann Reedy looks at the Central Bank’s powers to investigate people performing certain key roles at regulated entities. |
'Massively expanded' enforcement toolkit and 'potentially colossal' fines on the way for data administrators When the General Data Protection Regulation (EU 2016/679) comes into force on 25 May next the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner will be able to impose for the first time large administrative fines for data protection breaches. Muireann Reedy explains why it will pay to be compliant with the GDPR. |
The future of redress? A consideration of the Tracker Mortgage Examination The Central Bank of Ireland first announced details of its 'Tracker Mortgage Examination' in October 2015. The Examination is still on-going but by the end of February this year approximately €78 million had been paid in redress and compensation to impacted parties. Muireann Reedy concludes that, while it remains to be seen whether the guidelines put in place for redress under the Examination will act as a template for future redress programmes under the 2013 Act, what is clear is that the final bill for lenders involved in the Examination will be very significant by the time redress and compensation is paid, Appeals Panels are established and the costs of a potential enforcement investigation are factored in. |
Consequences of admissions in ASP Settlements As part of any settlement under its Administrative Sanctions Procedure (the ASP), the Central Bank of Ireland (the Central Bank) expects a breach to be admitted. Muireann Reedy examines the impact that this policy can have on a regulated entity or individual and contrasts the Central Bank’s position with the practice of other financial regulators. |
A decade of settlements under the Central Bank’s Administrative Sanctions Procedure The Central Bank entered its first settlement agreement under its Administrative Sanctions Procedure in 2006. Muireann Reedy of Dillon Eustace’s Regulatory Investigations Unit examines the evolution of publicity statements released following settlements under this regime, from the first brief statement released in 2006 to the robust statements which characterise today’s settlements. |